Powered by LiquidWeb NEW SEARCH FEATURE! IT WORKS!
Search all of OO for news, columnists, and articles about your favorites!

 
News  -/-  Recaps  -/-  Columns  -/-  Features  -/-  Reference  -/-  Archives  -/-  Interact  -/-  Site Info
 

Donate to Online Onslaught!
CLICK HERE TO HELP KEEP OO ALIVE!
MAIN PAGE
NEWS
     Daily Onslaught
RECAPS
     RAW
     SmackDown!
     PPV
     NWA-TNA
     Heat
     Velocity
     Other 
COLUMNS
     Obtuse Angle
     RAW Satire
     The Broad
         Perspective

     Inside the Ropes
     OOld Tyme
         Rasslin' Revue
    
Circa/Dungeon 
     Title Wave
    
Crashing the
         Boards

     Deconstruction
     Smarky Awards
     Big in Japan
     Guest Columnists
     2 Out of 3 Falls
     Devil's Due
     The Ring
     The Little Things
     Timeline
    
SK Rants
    
The Mac Files
     Sq'd Circle Jerk
     TWiFW
FEATURES
     RAW vs. SD!:
         Brand Battle
 
     Cheap Heat 
     Year in Review
     Monday Wars
     Road to WM 

     Interviews
REFERENCE
     Title Histories
     Real Names
     PPV Results
     Smart Glossary
     Birthdays 
ARCHIVES 
INTERACT
     Message Boards
     Live Chat 
SITE INFO
     Contact
     OO History

If you attend a live show, or have any other news for us, just send an e-mail to this address!  We'd also love to hear from you if you've got suggestions or complaints about the site...  let us have it!

 
DENNY'S DUNGEON
TNA: On the Eve of Impact
June 4, 2004

by Denny Burkholder
Courtesy of WrestleLine.com

 

By the time the majority of you read this column, the debut of NWA TNA's new show Impact will be history. Those of us who watched will have our first impressions, and those of us who didn't will want the details.

We've heard for YEARS how any American wrestling promotion that wishes to make a blip on the radar "needs television." So when the Jarrett family and their business partners launched TNA a couple years ago, they GOT television - but not the kind everyone meant. They went straight to pay-per-view. People predicted failure.

So the wrestling pundits modified their definition: now, any wrestling company hoping to grow beyond the indy level needed free television (certainly free for the viewers, if not necessarily for the company). TNA was highly visible to anyone with pay-per-view access and the inclination to drop $10 a week for a two-hour program. That was a pretty radical idea, and the case can be made either way regarding its success. On one hand, with all those stars on the roster (relative to those not under WWE contract, TNA's roster is very strong), TNA has somehow managed to pay them for their weekly efforts for two years and avoid going bankrupt. The proportion of wrestling viewers that actually fork over ten bones for TNA's weekly PPV is small, but it's apparently enough to allow them to tread water.

But then again, Paul Heyman kept ECW afloat for years despite never being financially stable. It can be done; with crafty financing, consolidation, and business associations, even the least financially sound institution can feign success for a while before the bills catch up to them. Who's to say TNA has EVER been financially sound? Who's to say that when the business deals go sour, and when the financing dries up, TNA will still be able to make its paydays?

So TNA has gone and secured a time slot on Fox Sports Net, and has named their new show Impact. Like ECW before them, they have a weekly program on basic cable - that one, magic ingredient that every wrestling company supposedly needs. Like ECW, TNA is now on free TV. ECW's show stood out from the rest of the stuff on TV, giving it an extra boost in viewership. TNA will try to follow suit with a six-sided ring, its successful X Division and some very formidable talent working the shows.

Impact now airs every Friday on Fox Sports Net stations at 3 p.m. (for most locales anyway). TNA's got the talent, the innovation, and the television. So did ECW. TNA's new challenge? Avoid ECW's fate.

If solid action, innovation, and TV were all it took, we'd still be watching ECW in 2004. There is certainly more to it than that. I've never run a wrestling company before, but it stand to reason that TNA needs to do a few other things in order to grow.

Firstly, They need to manage their finances well, so that if current business deals go belly-up, they can tread water until a new one presents itself. And TNA has to be patient. If Impact fails to deliver a solid audience after three or six months, they cannot get desperate and start blowing money trying to solve the problem fast. It may take a while for people to catch the show, and once they do, it might take months for them to work Impact into their regular viewing routine.

The six-sided ring is a gimmick, nothing more. There is talent in TNA - specifically in the X Division - that could turn the gimmick into a series of great matches, but the ring itself is a sideshow attraction, sort of like the bearded lady. Once the initial curiosity wears off, the ring had better be put to good use by the performers. If people tune in to Impact for the novelty of the ring, they're eventually going to come back because of the quality of the matches. No matter what brings viewers in the outset, everything always comes back to the performance of the wrestlers.

TNA is not short on talent, but sometimes you have to question their priorities. TNA at times seems like a revolving door of one-shot appearances. Roddy Piper, Sting, Hulk Hogan, Brian Urlacher, Lex Luger, country singer Toby Keith and other big names have passed through TNA, but they've never been the glue that held the show together. They were added attractions. And yet, when Jeff Jarrett or another TNA representative gets mainstream press, what clips do they show? Urlacher, Keith, Sting, and Hogan. Definitely names people will recognize and care about. But it's not the heart of TNA. TNA must stop selling itself based on celebrity guest shots, and start promoting guys like AJ Styles, Chris Harris, Christopher Daniels and other talent that has been the lifeblood of the TNA product.

Viewers might come for Toby Keith and be disappointed when all they find is AJ Styles. But if TNA promotes AJ Styles and viewers come to see HIM, they will leave a satisfied customer. Sure, Styles is far less recognizable than the stars TNA has had as guests. A clip of AJ Styles on The Best Damn Sports Show Period will attract far fewer people to sample TNA than a video of Sting or Urlacher will. But those who DO tune in for AJ Styles - or any of the other TNA staples - those are the fans who will REMAIN with TNA, and help it to grow.

It isn't that TNA doesn't appreciate its regulars. They just fall back on their guest appearances too often. And I guess you can't blame them. Stars like Mr. T and Mike Tyson have certainly boosted WWE's viewership in the past. However, when WWE promoted Mr. T, he was always at the side of Hulk Hogan - a charismatic WWE star. Mike Tyson was always at the side of either Stone Cold Steve Austin or Shawn Michaels - two more dynamic WWE stars. Some of the WWE viewers who showed up for Mr. T and Tyson stayed for Hulkamania and DX, but they did so because WWE made sure they piggybacked those one-off celeb appearances into a way to promote its own best talent.

I'll be tuning in to the debut edition of Impact in a couple of hours. I'm expecting a pretty good show, without getting my hopes high for a must-see event. After all, it's only a weekly basic cable program. It can't crush the promotion by itself, nor can it lift them without the help of other solid strategies.

Can it?

E-MAIL DENNY
BROWSE THE CIRCA ARCHIVES


  
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Bonding Exercises
 
RAW RECAP: The New Guy Blows It
 
PPV RECAP: WWE Night of Champions 2012
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: 18 Seconds? NO! NO! NO!
 
RAW RECAP: The Show Must Go On
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: The Boot Gets the Boot
 
RAW RECAP: Heyman Lands an Expansion Franchise
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Losing is the new Winning
 
RAW RECAP: Say My Name
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Deja Vu All Over Again
 
RAW RECAP: Dignity Before Gold?
 
PPV RECAP: SummerSlam 2012
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Backfired!
 
RAW RECAP: Bigger IS Better
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Hitting with Two Strikes
 
RAW RECAP: Heel, or Tweener?
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Destiny Do-Over
 
RAW RECAP: CM Punk is Not a Fan of Dwayne
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: The Returnening
 
RAW RECAP: Countdown to 1000
 
PPV RECAP: WWE Money in the Bank 2012
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Friday Night ZackDown
 
RAW RECAP: Closure's a Bitch
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: In-BRO-pendence Day
 
RAW RECAP: Crazy Gets What Crazy Wants
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Five Surprising MitB Deposits
 
RAW RECAP: Weeeellll, It's a Big MitB
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: #striketwo
 
RAW RECAP: Johnny B. Gone
 
PPV RECAP: WWE No Way Out 2012
 
RAW RECAP: Crazy Go Nuts
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: You're Welcome
 
RAW RECAP: Be a Star, My Ass
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Needs More Kane?
 
RAW RECAP: You Can't See Him
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Lady Power
 
RAW RECAP: Big Johnny Still in Charge
 
PPV RECAP: WWE Over the Limit 2012
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: One Gullible Fella
 
RAW RECAP: Anvil, or Red Herring?
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Everybody Hates Berto
 
RAW RECAP: Look Who's Back
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Care to go Best of Five?
 
RAW RECAP: An Ace Up His Sleeve
 
PPV RECAP: WWE Extreme Rules 2012
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Sh-Sh-Sheamus and the nOObs
 
RAW RECAP: Edge, the Motivational Speaker?
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: AJ is Angry, Jilted
 
RAW RECAP: Maybe Cena DOES Suck?
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: No! No! No!
 
RAW RECAP: Brock's a Jerk
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Back with a Bang
 
RAW RECAP: Yes! Yes! Yes!
 
PPV RECAP: WWE WrestleMania 28

 

 

 


All contents are Copyright 1995-2014 by OOWrestling.com.  All rights reserved.
This website is not affiliated with WWE or any other professional wrestling organization.  Privacy Statement.